The DSi has, as has been the case up until now with all DS models, a D-pad, four y, x, a, b buttons as well as start and select. The introduction allows for greater control for gamers and will no doubt be added into future games as developers create them. Furthermore, Nintendo has added a home button that, when pressed, will whip you back to the home screen. New to the 3DS and not present on the DSi is a motion sensor and gryoscope for physical, three-dimensional gaming.
Although we've yet to see any implementation of this, that means gamers will be able to physically move the console just like they can the Wii Remote to control action on screen. Theoretically, and this isn't confirmed, we presume that means you could use it as a Wii remote too.
Both devices contain wireless connectivity to play others in the room or around the world. However with the 3DS, Nintendo has made it possible so that you can leave the Wi-Fi connection on when not in use so that it can automatically exchange data with other Nintendo 3DS systems or receive data via the Internet while in sleep mode.
Note for older Game Boy Advance users: you are now clearly in the past. There are no differences here between the two that have been so far announced at E3 Both will come with an internet browser built in and both will presumably offer the standard interface software that lets you manage your wireless settings and photos. The 3DS will be able to run all current games on the market for the Nintendo DS, however it's not the case the other way around.
New features like motion gaming and the 3D elements mean the DSi - like the DS before it when the DSi got a camera - won't support all titles going forward.
They have to be made that way first. The 3DS, as far as you're concerned, is vapourware with no price, not even a guide price attached to it at the moment. The DSi is on sale in virtually all corners of the globe. As for the 3DS, Nintendo might have shown off the hardware working, but they haven't pointed to a date for launch. We believe this is not because of the hardware but because there are no games available for it yet. Has to be a 3DS. Too bad some get a proven free pass.
User Info: RaccoonCity. On those prices, I'd say the DSLite. My favorite I've owned. But there are better ways to play DS games. Battery life is much lower on 3DS and there will be tons of ancillary features you won't use for DS games.
You'll still have to charge a 3DS even in DS mode daily - or at best, close to daily. DSLite can go about a week on moderate play without charging. The New 3DS should be coming out here in a few months anyway. Shamrock99 posted To answer your question, the DSi XL is the same resolution but bigger, which is not necessarily the best of both worlds. The question here is which makes things uglier, just blowing up the pixels, or going to a larger screen with upscaling. In my experience, the upscaling on at least the regular 3DS is pretty good.
I'd suggest you go to a pawnshop or something and see which you like better, or better yet, just going for the 3DS XL. Trust me when I say, access to the 3DS library is going to trump whatever minor visual difference there may be, big time. User Info: Smacd. They look fine. The DS Phat truly is too unwieldy for a handheld, but it actually looks nice and Nintendo released some really nice color schemes for the DS.
Coupled with the worst brightness of the handhelds on this list, and the DS Phat looks nice but is hard to return to. While stereoscopic 3D is incredibly well implemented with most first party titles Ocarina of Time 3D is downright stunning with 3D turned on, it was a feature that went grossly underused even by those that actually liked it. Its base feels oddly cheap as well, but at least it was priced accordingly. Where the Phat was chunky, the Lite was sleek.
Where the Phat was dark, the Lite was bright. Where the Phat was too big for its own good, the DS Lite is arguably the perfect size for a handheld. Until the DSi.
0コメント