This equation tells us that an object subjected to an external force will accelerate and that the amount of the acceleration is proportional to the size of the force. The amount of acceleration is also inversely proportional to the mass of the object; for equal forces, a heavier object will experience less acceleration than a lighter object.
Considering the momentum equation, a force causes a change in velocity; and likewise, a change in velocity generates a force. The equation works both ways. The velocity, force, acceleration, and momentum have both a magnitude and a direction associated with them. Scientists and mathematicians call this a vector quantity. The equations shown here are actually vector equations and can be applied in each of the component directions.
We have only looked at one direction, and, in general, an object moves in all three directions up-down, left-right, forward-back. His third law states that for every action force in nature there is an equal and opposite reaction. If object A exerts a force on object B, object B also exerts an equal and opposite force on object A.
In other words, forces result from interactions. An object at rest remains at rest, and an object in motion remains in motion at constant speed and in a straight line unless acted on by an unbalanced force. The acceleration of an object depends on the mass of the object and the amount of force applied. Whenever one object exerts a force on another object, the second object exerts an equal and opposite on the first. Examples of inertia involving aerodynamics: The motion of an airplane when a pilot changes the throttle setting of an engine.
The motion of a ball falling down through the atmosphere. A model rocket being launched up into the atmosphere. The motion of a kite when the wind changes.
The motion of a spinning ball , the air is deflected to one side, and the ball reacts by moving in the opposite The motion of a jet engine produces thrust and hot exhaust gases flow out the back of the engine, and a thrusting force is produced in the opposite direction. Yes No. This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Your request has been submitted. So both "Bernoulli" and "Newton" are correct. Integrating the effects of either the pressure or the velocity determines the aerodynamic force on an object.
We can use equations developed by each of them to determine the magnitude and direction of the aerodynamic force. Arguments arise because people mis-apply Bernoulli and Newton's equations and because they over-simplify the description of the problem of aerodynamic lift.
The most popular incorrect theory of lift arises from a mis-application of Bernoulli's equation. The theory is known as the "equal transit time" or "longer path" theory which states that wings are designed with the upper surface longer than the lower surface, to generate higher velocities on the upper surface because the molecules of gas on the upper surface have to reach the trailing edge at the same time as the molecules on the lower surface.
The theory then invokes Bernoulli's equation to explain lower pressure on the upper surface and higher pressure on the lower surface resulting in a lift force. The error in this theory involves the specification of the velocity on the upper surface. In reality, the velocity on the upper surface of a lifting wing is much higher than the velocity which produces an equal transit time.
If we know the correct velocity distribution, we can use Bernoulli's equation to get the pressure, then use the pressure to determine the force. But the equal transit velocity is not the correct velocity. Another incorrect theory uses a Venturi flow to try to determine the velocity. But this also gives the wrong answer since a wing section isn't really half a Venturi nozzle. There is also an incorrect theory which uses Newton's third law applied to the bottom surface of a wing.
This theory equates aerodynamic lift to a stone skipping across the water. It neglects the physical reality that both the lower and upper surface of a wing contribute to the turning of a flow of gas. The real details of how an object generates lift are very complex and do not lend themselves to simplification.
For a gas, we have to simultaneously conserve the mass , momentum , and energy in the flow. Newton's laws of motion are statements concerning the conservation of momentum. Bernoulli's equation is derived by considering conservation of energy.
So both of these equations are satisfied in the generation of lift; both are correct. The conservation of mass introduces a lot of complexity into the analysis and understanding of aerodynamic problems. For example, from the conservation of mass, a change in the velocity of a gas in one direction results in a change in the velocity of the gas in a direction perpendicular to the original change. This is very different from the motion of solids, on which we base most of our experiences in physics.
The simultaneous conservation of mass, momentum, and energy of a fluid while neglecting the effects of air viscosity are called the Euler Equations after Leonard Euler. If we include the effects of viscosity, we have the Navier-Stokes Equations which are named after two independent researchers in France and in England.
To truly understand the details of the generation of lift, one has to have a good working knowledge of the Euler Equations. Which camp is correct? What is the argument?
0コメント