Something that is very nice to have in certain situations. Canon has a reputation for video. The 5D Mark II was the camera that launched a thousand film makers and they have heavily invested in the C for film makers. There are relatively few changes to video, obviously the cleaner image at high ISO is welcomed and the inclusion of a headphone jack is nice.
Basically though, it is made up of small improvements over the video on the 5D Mark II, which is obviously not a bad thing. There is a disappointment that it does not have the headphone jack or audio input found on the 5D Mark III.
In some tests on pre production models there was also talk of moire but, footage from the 6D seems to be of a high quality. The main advantage both of these cameras hold over the 7D for video is the better performance in low light. It also lacks the headphone jack, but this can be done with a well known work around. The 7D still holds up well for video and although there is a slightly different look to video shot on the 7D, many used it in conjunction with a 5D Mark II on productions and the difference on final footage was unnoticeable to all but the most trained of eyes.
The lack of USB 3. Everything else is pretty much standard apart from on the 6D. This is a first for Canon and a feature that will interest many, especially as with the addition of your smartphone you can have full remote control over the camera including live view. The 6D is also currently the lightest full frame camera on the market.
Many will not be fussed by this, but it is good news for some. A camera and lens combo can be heavy, especially when being used all day.
For those looking for a more light weight camera setup the 6D coupled with the new F4 saves a lot of weight compared to the 5D Mark III and a f2. The 7D is a great camera. For wildlife or sports photographers on a budget it offers a great image quality and a very good autofocus system. It is a good upgrade from models lower down the Canon range. You will also benefit from the extra reach that the 1.
The only downside to the 7D in this test is it cannot compete in terms of high ISO with the other two cameras on this comparison. The 6D is aimed at those who want to make the jump to full frame. It does this incredibly well. The image quality is very good and it competes in most respects with the Nikon D although the D does benefit from a slightly better autofocus system and a higher fps burst rate.
It would be simple to say that it is the 5D Mark II replacement. Well it is aiming for the market that was dominated by that camera and it does it well, even beating out the 5D Mark II in some respects.
The addition of built in GPS and Wi-Fi is a first for Canon and the remote control via Smartphone feature is certainly a very nice touch. Hi Tom, thanks so much for the comment! Based on this, you can start to determine whether the camera will work for your purposes. In terms of image quality, I agree that lens resolution matters greatly, but camera resolution matters, too.
Your email address will not be published. Save my name and email in this browser to see the comment immediatley and edit it if needed.
You can clear your browser data at any time. Subscribe to our weekly newsletter. We won't send you spam. Unsubscribe at any time. Canon 6D Mark II vs. Canon 6D Mark II. Canon 7D Mark II. APS-C 1. Continuous Shooting Rate. Autofocus Points. Buy It Now! See real-world photos taken with the 7D. How does it shoot? Canon 6D Mark II in the real world.
See real-world photos taken with the 6D Mark II. Better color depth. Higher effective ISO. Longer stills battery life. Common Strengths Eye-level viewfinder. Common Weaknesses Focus peaking. Body Only Body Only Kit with mm lens. Read our Canon 7D Full Review.
0コメント